Tom Cruise settles L&S abandoned by daddy lawsuit: a win for CO$?
For over a year, Tom Cruise has been waging a war against Bauer publishing for an article written by Life & Style. The story claimed Tom had abandoned his youngest daughter, Suri, in the wake of his divorce from Katie Holmes. It was true that Tom hadn’t visited with Suri in over 100 days, but no matter.Last October, Tom sued Bauer publishing for $50 million over the “abandoned by daddy” cover story. In February, we heard the lawsuit was headed to trial.
About a month ago, we heard the suit was proceeding, and then there were delicious details revealed in a deposition. Tom didn’t do himself any favors by squirming on the stand and admitting he gave up opportunities to visit Suri to attend Scientology functions instead. I’ve been saying that if Tom couldn’t handle himself in a mere deposition, then he had a world of hurt coming to him in the jury trial he was demanding. Well that trial won’t happen. The suit has been settled and dismissed with prejudice, so it cannot be refiled. Bauer has apologized to Tom as well:
Actor Tom Cruise has settled a $50 million defamation suit he filed last year against a tabloid publisher after it ran stories accusing him of having “abandoned” his daughter Suri during his divorce from her mother, actress Katie Holmes.
The lawsuit against Bauer Publishing, In Touch and Life & Style magazines “has been settled,” said Lindsay Ferraro, public relations director for both magazines, in an e-mail. “The terms of the settlement were not disclosed and remain confidential.”
Neither Bauer Publishing nor the magazines “intended to communicate that Tom Cruise had cut off all ties and abandoned his daughter, Suri, and regret if anyone drew that inference from anything they published,” she added.
A court document noted that the suit was dismissed Friday “with prejudice,” meaning that it cannot be refiled.
The one-paragraph settlement says the dismissal was agreed to by Cruise and the tabloid publisher and that each side was responsible for their own legal fees.
In a sworn affidavit filed last month in federal court, Cruise rejected as “patently false” the assertion that he had abandoned his daughter, now 7. “I have in no way cut Suri out of my life — whether physically, emotionally, financially or otherwise,” he said.
The publisher said then in a statement that both magazines “stand behind the reporting and articles at issue in Mr. Cruise’s action.”
The July 18, 2012, Life & Style cover carried the headline “SURI IN TEARS, ABANDONED BY HER DAD” along with a photo of the child. There was no accompanying text to explain the headline.
The complaint also pointed to an InTouch cover story from September 2012 headlined “44 DAYS WITHOUT TOM … ABANDONED BY DADDY … Suri is left heartbroken as Tom suddenly shuts her out and even misses her first day of school… HAS HE CHOSEN SCIENTOLOGY OVER SURI FOR GOOD?”
Cruise said his daughter often accompanied him during his travels around the world to make movies, which “allowed me to see my daughter while still fulfilling my obligations to my work, my colleagues, and the studios that hire me.”
[From CNN]
I’d like to know which side rolled over in this lawsuit. Has Bauer been enduring the usual threats by the CO$ in manner of Operation Snow White? There’s probably been some of that going on, but who knows.
So what did Tom get out of this settlement? Probably some money that will be donated to Scientology, but he got what he really wanted — an apology. All along, Tom has insisted that his constant phone calls were enough to maintain a daddy-daughter relationship. He’s always used the tabloids for his own purposes. Now Tom thinks he’s proven to the world that he’s a wonderful father. What a deluded man, but no tabloid will ever call him on it again. He’s made sure of that.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet & In Touch
ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7pLHLnpmirJOdxm%2BvzqZmbGxgbH52e9OopJiboqq2tLG%2BrJytrJyawKC40piYm5membyvscOYmbKXlJaxpcW%2BpZiwq6WewaCtvrCgp5eWpL%2Bgr85o